Guide
Due date by LMP vs. conception date: which is right?
Two due-date methods, two different anchor dates, and a gap between them that's rarely exactly zero.
By Buğra SözeriPublished
Two due-date calculations circulate for the same pregnancy, and they don’t always land on the same day. One counts from the first day of your last menstrual period (LMP) and adds 280 days. The other counts from a known conception dateand adds 266 days. Both are legitimate, both are used clinically, and the gap between what they predict is the single most common source of “why did my due date change” confusion.
The math behind each method
LMP dating uses Naegele’s rule: add 280 days (40 weeks) to the first day of the last period. It’s the default because most people know their LMP date more reliably than their exact conception date, and it doesn’t require knowing when ovulation happened.
Conception-date dating adds 266 days (38 weeks) to a known or estimated conception date, which is meant to represent the day of ovulation and fertilization directly, skipping the assumption baked into LMP dating.
| Method | Anchor date | Days added | Assumes |
|---|---|---|---|
| LMP | First day of last period | 280 | 28-day cycle, ovulation on day 14 |
| Conception | Date of conception | 266 | Conception date is known accurately |
The 14-day gap between 280 and 266 is exactly the assumed length of the follicular phase — the time from LMP to ovulation in a standard cycle. That's the hidden assumption LMP dating makes, and it's also the reason the two methods diverge for anyone whose cycle isn’t textbook-regular.
When the two methods disagree
If your cycle is close to 28 days and ovulation lands near day 14, LMP and conception dating will produce due dates within a day or two of each other. If your cycles run longer (say, 32 or 35 days), ovulation likely happened later than day 14 — which means the LMP-based due date is probably too early, and a conception-based estimate (if you know the date) is more trustworthy.
This is also why clinicians routinely check LMP-based dating against a first-trimester ultrasound estimate, and revise the due date if the two disagree by more than about a week. Ultrasound measures fetal size directly rather than relying on a recalled date and an assumed cycle length, which is why ACOG treats it as the most reliable of the three inputs when available.
Which one should you enter?
- Know your conception date precisely (single encounter, ovulation-tracked, or IVF transfer date)? Use conception-date math — it removes the 14-day assumption entirely.
- Only know your LMP, and your cycles run close to 28 days? LMP dating is a solid default and is what most people use without a second thought.
- Irregular or unusually long/short cycles? Treat an LMP-based due date as a starting estimate to be confirmed by ultrasound, not a fixed number.
Either way, a due date from either method is a statistical estimate, not a deadline — only about 1 in 20 babies actually arrives on the calculated day.
Frequently asked questions
- Why don't LMP and conception dates give the same due date?
- In theory they should — LMP + 280 days should equal conception + 266 days, since ovulation is assumed to fall 14 days after the LMP. In practice the gap between LMP and actual ovulation varies by person and by cycle, so the two calculations only agree exactly when your cycle happens to be a textbook 28 days with ovulation on day 14.
- Which method should I use if I know my conception date?
- If you know your conception date with confidence — from ovulation tracking, IVF, or a single-encounter cycle — it's generally the more reliable anchor, since it removes the assumption about a 14-day follicular phase that LMP-based dating relies on.
- Is ultrasound dating more accurate than either method?
- Yes, especially a first-trimester ultrasound. ACOG considers early ultrasound the most accurate dating method because it measures the fetus directly rather than relying on a recalled date and an assumed cycle length; clinicians often revise an LMP-based due date if it disagrees with ultrasound by more than about 5–7 days.
- Does a longer or shorter cycle change which method is more accurate?
- Yes. LMP-based dating assumes a 28-day cycle with ovulation on day 14. If your cycles run longer or shorter than that, the true conception date shifts away from day 14, and LMP math drifts further from a conception-based calculation — which is one reason irregular-cycle pregnancies get re-dated by ultrasound more often.
Sources & references
Authoritative references cited by this piece. Verified by Buğra Sözeri on the dates shown and re-checked at every deploy.
- ACOG — Methods for Estimating the Due Date (Committee Opinion 700) — The clinical basis for Naegele's rule (LMP + 280 days) and its use alongside ultrasound and conception dating(as of )
- CDC — Pregnancy: Estimated Due Date — CDC reproductive health reference on pregnancy dating conventions(as of )
Related
More guides on this topic
- Heart rate zones explained: zone 2, the Karvonen formula, and honest limitsThe five-zone model, why 220-minus-age misses badly for individuals, Karvonen vs percentage-of-max, what zone 2 actually is, and when zones mislead.
- Is BMI accurate? What it gets right, and the four cases it gets wrong.BMI is a population-screening tool, not a personal diagnosis. Here's exactly when it misleads and what to use instead.
- How to calculate TDEE correctly (and why most online calculators are off by 10%)TDEE = BMR × activity multiplier. The three reasons your maintenance calorie estimate keeps missing.
- How to measure your bra size at home (the modern method, not the +4 rule)Tape measure, snug not tight, two numbers in, US/UK/EU sizes out. The retired +4/+5 method and what replaced it.
Published September 25, 2026