Guide
How to calculate BMI by hand (metric and imperial)
BMI is one division and one squaring — the arithmetic that trips people up is almost always a unit-conversion slip, not the formula itself.
By Buğra SözeriPublished
BMI has a reputation for being confusing, but the formula itself is two steps: divide, then square. Almost every by-hand mistake comes from a unit slip — squaring centimeters instead of meters, or forgetting the imperial formula needs its own conversion constant — not from the math being genuinely hard. Here is the full calculation, worked both ways.
The metric formula
BMI = weight (kg) ÷ height (m)²
Worked example: a person weighing 70 kg at 1.75 m tall. First square the height: 1.75 × 1.75 = 3.0625. Then divide weight by that: 70 ÷ 3.0625 ≈ 22.86. That falls inside the WHO “normal weight” band of 18.5–24.9, so this person’s BMI reads as healthy by the standard category boundaries.
The most common by-hand error at this step is squaring height in centimeters (175) instead of meters (1.75) — 175² is 30,625, and dividing 70 by that gives 0.0023, a number so far off it’s an obvious red flag, but people transcribing by hand sometimes miss it. Always convert to meters before squaring.
The imperial formula
BMI = 703 × weight (lb) ÷ height (in)²
The 703 constant exists purely to convert pounds and inches into the metric formula’s kilograms and meters in one step, so you don’t have to convert units manually first. Worked example: 154 lb at 5’9” (69 inches). Square the height: 69 × 69 = 4,761. Multiply weight by 703: 154 × 703 = 108,262. Divide: 108,262 ÷ 4,761 ≈ 22.74 — close to, but not identical to, what the metric formula on the equivalent metric inputs would give, purely due to the imperial constant’s rounding. For the conversion logic behind pounds and inches themselves, see our ideal weight formulas guide, which covers the related (but distinct) height-weight formulas doctors use.
Side-by-side comparison
| Step | Metric | Imperial |
|---|---|---|
| Inputs | 70 kg, 1.75 m | 154 lb, 69 in |
| Square height | 3.0625 | 4,761 |
| Multiply weight (imperial only) | — | 154 × 703 = 108,262 |
| Divide | 70 ÷ 3.0625 | 108,262 ÷ 4,761 |
| Result | 22.86 | 22.74 |
Why calculators still round differently
Even two tools both using the “correct” formula can disagree slightly. Some use 703 for the imperial constant, others use 704.5 (a different, also-accepted rounding of the same conversion). Some round your height to the nearest whole inch or centimeter before calculating; others keep full decimal precision. None of this changes which WHO category you land in unless your BMI sits right on a boundary — but it does explain why manually checking a calculator’s output against your own by-hand math might differ by a tenth of a point. For what those category boundaries mean and where they hold up, see is BMI accurate? This guide is educational only, not medical advice.
Frequently asked questions
- What is the BMI formula?
- BMI = weight in kilograms ÷ (height in meters)². For imperial units the equivalent formula is BMI = 703 × weight in pounds ÷ (height in inches)², where 703 is the metric conversion constant that makes the imperial version produce the same result as the metric one.
- Where does the 703 constant in the imperial formula come from?
- It converts pounds and inches into the metric formula's kilograms and meters in one step. One pound is 0.45359237 kg and one inch is 0.0254 m, so the conversion factor works out to 0.45359237 ÷ 0.0254² ≈ 703.07, rounded to 703 (some sources use 704.5, a slightly different rounding — both are accepted approximations).
- Do I square height in centimeters or meters?
- Meters. Squaring height in centimeters without converting to meters first is the single most common by-hand BMI mistake — it produces a number 10,000 times too small. Always divide centimeters by 100 to get meters before squaring.
- Why do two BMI calculators sometimes give slightly different results for the same inputs?
- Almost always rounding: some tools use 703 for the imperial constant, others 704.5; some round height to the nearest whole inch or centimeter before computing, others keep full decimal precision throughout. The difference is typically under 0.1 BMI points and doesn't change the health category, but it explains why two 'BMI calculators' rarely agree to the second decimal.
Sources & references
Authoritative references cited by this piece. Verified by Buğra Sözeri on the dates shown and re-checked at every deploy.
- CDC — About Adult BMI — The CDC's stated adult BMI formula and its imperial (704.5 factor) variant(as of )
- WHO — Body mass index (BMI) — WHO's definition of BMI as weight (kg) / height (m)²(as of )
- NIST — General Tables of Units of Measurement (inch, pound definitions) — Exact inch-to-centimeter and pound-to-kilogram factors used in the imperial BMI formula(as of )
Related
More guides on this topic
- Ideal weight formulas: where Devine, Robinson, and Hamwi came from — and what they're actually forDevine was written for drug dosing, not dieting. Where the formulas come from, how much they disagree for the same height, and the narrow uses where they're still legitimate.
- How to calculate your macros (without the influencer math)The five-step procedure — TDEE, calorie target, protein, fat, carbs as the remainder — with evidence-based protein ranges and the myths the fitness feed keeps recycling.
- Heart rate zones explained: zone 2, the Karvonen formula, and honest limitsThe five-zone model, why 220-minus-age misses badly for individuals, Karvonen vs percentage-of-max, what zone 2 actually is, and when zones mislead.
Published September 25, 2026