MET × weight × time — how nutritionists and exercise physiologists estimate exercise burn.
BS
Buğra SözeriHealth
Published
Reviewed by Convertitive Health Desk
Medical disclaimer:This calculator is a screening estimate. Individuals with cardiovascular conditions, exercise restrictions, or weight-management programs under clinical supervision should follow their care team’s guidance over a generic MET estimate.
MET (metabolic equivalent of task) is a unit of exercise intensity: 1 MET equals the energy cost of sitting quietly — about 1 kcal/kg/hr or 3.5 ml O₂/kg/min. Running at 8 km/h is 8 METs, meaning it burns roughly 8× resting energy. The standard formula is kcal = MET × weight (kg) × hours.
The 22 activities below come from the 2011 update to the Compendium of Physical Activities (Ainsworth et al.), the reference standard used by epidemiologists and the American College of Sports Medicine. Final burn always adjusts to your TDEE — fitness trackers typically over-report by 15–30% for everything except steady-state cardio.
Calories burned
300kcal
MET 8.00 × 30 min · 10.0 kcal/min
15 min
150kcal
30 min
300kcal
60 min
600kcal
Formula: kcal = MET × weight (kg) × hours. MET values from the 2011 Compendium of Physical Activities (Ainsworth et al.). Real burn varies ±20% by fitness level, technique, and conditions.
How to use
1
Pick the activity
Choose from the dropdown — 22 common activities with MET values from Walking (3.5) to Jump rope (11.8). If your exact activity isn't listed, pick the closest match by intensity.
2
Enter duration and weight
Duration in minutes, weight in kg or lb. Heavier bodies burn more per minute because moving more mass costs more energy — the MET formula scales linearly with body weight.
3
Adjust intensity
Light = ×0.75 (slower pace, lower effort). Moderate = ×1.0 (matches Compendium baseline). Vigorous = ×1.25 (race pace, max effort). Real RPE varies; calibrate against perceived exertion.
4
Read the result
Total kcal plus per-minute rate and 15 / 30 / 60 minute references. Use these for daily energy planning, not as a license to eat back every estimated calorie.
Sample MET values
Activity
MET
kcal / 30 min @ 75 kg
Yoga (Hatha)
2.5
94
Walking (brisk)
3.5
131
Dancing
4.8
180
Weightlifting (vigorous)
6.0
225
Cycling (moderate)
6.8
255
Swimming (moderate)
7.0
263
Running (8 km/h)
8.0
300
HIIT / circuit
8.0
300
Stair climbing
8.8
330
Jump rope
11.8
443
Frequently asked questions
Are MET values exact?
MET values are population averages built from indirect calorimetry studies. Individual burn varies by ±20% based on fitness, body composition, technique, and environmental conditions. The Compendium itself notes MET values represent the mean energy cost — not a guaranteed personal figure.
Do calorie burns vary by fitness level?
Yes — more than people expect. A trained runner moves at higher pace for the same heart rate, so calories per minute often rise with fitness. But efficiency also rises: a trained cyclist may burn fewer kcal at 20 km/h than a beginner because their movement economy is better. Net: MET tables work best for people of average fitness.
Is my fitness tracker accurate?
For steady-state cardio (running, cycling) wrist-worn trackers land within ±10–15% of lab values. For weightlifting, HIIT, and irregular movement they often over-report by 25–50%. The 2017 Stanford accuracy study found the Apple Watch was closest at 27% off; some devices were 90%+ off. Use trackers as trend, not truth.
Should I 'eat back' exercise calories?
Partial credit only — eat back 50–75% of estimated burn, not 100%. The MET formula doesn't subtract the BMR your body would burn at rest during the same hour, so it slightly over-counts. Trackers compound the problem. If your scale stalls, you're eating back too much.
Does EPOC ('afterburn') matter?
Excess post-exercise oxygen consumption from high-intensity work adds 6–15% to the workout's burn over the following hours. Vigorous HIIT and heavy lifting carry the largest EPOC; steady cardio almost none. The intensity ×1.25 multiplier in this calculator approximates EPOC for vigorous sessions.
Why are walking and weightlifting (light) the same MET?
Both sit around 3.5 METs because energy cost is similar — light-load resistance training with rest periods averages out to roughly the same per-minute output as brisk walking. Vigorous weightlifting with short rests rises to 6.0 METs, which more accurately captures barbell circuits and high-volume programs.
About
The formula in detail
1 MET = 1 kcal per kg of body weight per hour. So kcal burned = MET × weight (kg) × time (hours). For a 75 kg runner at 8 MET running for 30 minutes: 8 × 75 × 0.5 = 300 kcal. The formula treats body weight as a constant linear factor — heavier bodies burn more because moving more mass requires more ATP.
Why MET tables are still the standard
MET values are derived from indirect calorimetry — measuring oxygen consumption while subjects perform the activity in a lab. The Compendium of Physical Activities, first published in 1993 and updated in 2000 and 2011, aggregates hundreds of these studies. Epidemiology, public-health guidelines (CDC, WHO), and clinical exercise prescriptions all reference MET values; the precision is enough for that work even if it isn't enough for elite training.
When to trust a heart-rate model instead
If you have a chest-strap HRM and have run a VO₂max test, heart-rate-based calorie models (Keytel et al. 2005) outperform MET tables. For most people the two methods agree to within 10–15%, so MET tables are fine — and a chest strap is the single biggest accuracy upgrade if you want better numbers.
Sources & references
Authoritative references behind the math, constants, and tables on this page. Verified by Buğra Sözeri on the dates shown and re-checked at every deploy.